Although filled with supposed facts from experts, the article is nothing more than a weak argument for casual sex and doing whatever you want. Virgins were viewed as pure and moral because by definition, they were.
People used to abstain not just for the sake of saying that they were pure, but because their morals dictated that they act in such a manner and because they wanted to act in such a manner. Virginity is not the only outcome of purity and virtue, but it is inherently tied to purity and morality, and is certainly more than just a stand-in.
Second, what misogynistic ideal seeks to repress female sexuality? Last time I checked, it seems that misogynists get grief for taking advantage of women and reducing them to nothing more than their sex appeals, and it seems that a true misogynist would be more than happy to accept sex devoid of meaning and consequence.
Misogynists by definition view themselves as superior to women and would seem to put no value on the sexuality of a woman. If a man views the sexuality or lack of sexuality of a woman as valuable, then he is certainly not a misogynist.
The author perpetuates virgin-shaming
The title of the article is dangerously misleading and blatantly false. The two psychologists referenced in the article provide a total of five quotes, three of which have date to do with claims that justify sex on the first date, and sex of first actually suggests not having sex on the first date. The rest of the article lists a few quotes from Cosmo readers on sex and relationships, but the information is nothing more than anecdotes and opinions. But only if you want to!
Sex on the first date: my experience
Both the author and Cosmo felt it worthwhile to write a whole article arguing the supposed truth of benefits of sex on the first date, only to undermine the argument by saying that ultimately you should still do whatever you want. The irony here and the problem with much of modern day society is that no matter the truth, you should ultimately do whatever you want and whatever makes you feel good.
The real evidence for or against having sex on the first date is irrelevant regardless of the facts because you should still go about doing whatever you want anyway. Good writing begins by making a point and driving it home.
This is only date if sex means that to her. The women she has seen who feel devalued and regretful the morning after sex does not feel that way because of anything the guy did sex what they self-imposed. Sex has value and is the deepest and most intimate way to express yourself to first. Most people will admit this to some extent, and women, in particular, attach meaning and value to sexual acts that are tied to their self-esteem.
Healthy and lasting relationships require much more than sex, and because of this Walfish says that sex on the first date does affect the formation of long term relationships.
6 reasons you should have sex on the first date
Without taking the required necessary time to get to know the other person, this relationship becomes foundationally built on sex instead of the other important values. While sex certainly brings a unitive value, it is not the foundation for a relationship, but a byproduct of that foundation.
A study published in the Journal of Sex Research confirms this sentiment, citing 11, unmarried individuals who first lower levels of date and relationship satisfaction sex their long-term relationships than did those couples who waited or abstained from sex. At best, sex on the first date seems to have little to no positive impact on the future of the relationship, and at worst, lowers relationship satisfaction or leaves women who value themselves and their sexuality with feelings of regret.
The party and up for the impose newsletter!
Research consistently shows that the fewer sexual partners a woman has, the lower her rate of divorce. Sex is an intimate expression of love and understanding that is tragically cheapened and devalued in our modern day society. Main Menu.